Quick Links:
BULLETIN BOARD
UPDATED BIDDER'S LIST
The Bidder's List was updated based on an Interim Final Rule issued by USDOT on 10/3/2025 to remove the requirement to report race and gender: BIDDER’S LIST
You may need to clear the cache in the web browser, if the new version is not downloading.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Qualified Products List (QPL)
Please review the expiration dates on the Department’s QPL regarding metal guardrail and associated materials. Please contact Randy Boysen at rboysen@mt.gov with questions or concerns.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Manufactured Products Waiver Notification
Beginning with the November 13, 2025 letting, the manufactured products waiver within 23 CFR 635.410 will be rescinded. Effectively, this means that the final manufacture of all materials defined as manufactured products in Section MT 601 of the MDT Materials Manual must meet domestic origin requirements. The Department is in the process of updating contract documents. Please contact Randy Boysen at rboysen@mt.gov with questions or concerns.
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2nd Tier Subcontractors
For contractors that intend to use 2nd tier subcontractors in an effort to meet an SBE/DBE goal, please ensure that the specific dollar amount for the work they will be performing is indicated in the Bidders List. If you have any questions about 2nd tier subcontractors on projects with DBE/SBE goals or how to enter that information in the bid file or on the bidders list, please contact Maggie Metzger at 406.422.9421 or mmetzger@mt.gov.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
SBE Goals
Effective with the June 5, 2025 letting, MDT's Civil Rights Bureau will be identifying project specific Small Business Enterprise (SBE) goals. The percentage for the goal will be outlined by special provision. Please see the DBE/SBE Webpage
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
UPDATE TO BIDDING PROCESS EFFECTIVE 6/5/25 LETTING
Effective with the June 5, 2025 letting, the Bidder’s List file must be attached in AASHTOWare Project Bids and include the required information for the prime contractor, subcontractors, and suppliers that provided a quote for the project. There will be a tab in AASHTOWare Project Bids where the Bidder’s List will be uploaded, prior to bid submission.
A video tutorial outlining this new process can be viewed at the following link: BIDDER'S LIST AASHTOWARE PROJECT BIDS TUTORIAL
The DBE-SBE Bidding Requirements special provision will be effective with the June 5, 2025 letting: DBE-SBE BIDDING REQUIREMENTS SPECIAL PROVISION
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2025 Bulletin Board Requirements: Prime contractors are responsible for erecting a bulletin board prior to work commencing on the project. It must include all required notices and posters, plus the contract-specific wage rates and EEO Policy Statements for the Prime and all Subs. Work with the Engineering Project Manager / Maintenance Superintendent or their designee to identify the most appropriate format and location for the board given the unique aspects of the project. Encouraged locations include staging areas or adjacent to project roadways. Subcontractors must supply their EEO Policy Statement to Prime contractors. Full requirements and examples can be found in the BULLETIN BOARD RESOURCE GUIDE
________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Watch - Public Bid Opening - Live Stream: ZOOM MEETING INFORMATION
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Advertised Projects: If you would like to receive the Invitation for Bids PDF document when projects are advertised, please send an email request to mdtcps@mt.gov. Follow the link for more information: EMAIL DISTRIBUTION
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
101 - N OF FLOWING WELLS-NORTH & FLOWING WELLS-NORTH (MT-24) - October 09, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Tuesday 23-SEP-2025 03:27 PM
Company: Iowa Trenchless
Contact: Jason Klein
Were there any soil borings done or any geotechnical information available that is specific to the proposed SCP at Sta. 888+45?
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 24-SEP-2025 03:30 PM
The linked Boring Logs and Soil Boring Information special provision are hereby incorporated into this contract. BORING LOGS and SOIL BORING SPECIAL PROVISION
-2-
Submitted: Friday 26-SEP-2025 08:48 AM
Company: Allstates Pavement Recycling & Stabilization
Contact: Jim McNulty
Reading through the specifications for the Cold Recycled Plant Mix, we noticed that a closed loop circuit crusher is required to meet the 100% gradation under the 1.25" sieve. Would the state allow a Single Unit, Wirtgen 380 CRi recycler to perform the milling/crushing/mixing to meet the specification? Numerous states that do CIR each year, such as SD, ND, MN, IA, WI, all allow single unit trains to perform this work. The specification that is currently written will only allow one contractor to perform the CIR. Montana DOT would be pleased with the Wirtgen 380 CRi and the overall final product. Please feel free to contact Dave Johnson, PE a senior Regional Engineer at the Asphalt Institute for questions regarding the use of a Single Unit Train.
Answer
Submitted: Monday 6-OCT-2025 04:36PM
A Single Train Crushing and Mixing Unit will be allowed. The linked special provision, Single Train Crushing and Mixing Unit is hereby added to this contract. SPECIAL PROVISION
-3-
Submitted: Tuesday 30-SEP-2025 08:06 PM
Company: Prince, Inc.
Contact: Mike Sharp
This road is out of section and the cold-in-place will not noticeably change that. Then the overlay is only 0.1' thick which does not allow for any shaping of the roadway. Would MDT add a leveling course to the entire project (1,000 ton/mile) in order to improve the ride and strengthen the section?
Answer
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 10:17 AM
No, MDT will not add a leveling course to the project.
-4-
Submitted: Wednesday 01-OCT-2025 04:43 PM
Company: Alpine Sign Inc
Contact: John
Please provide Sign Design Calculations for this project.
Answer
Submitted: Thursday 02-OCT-2025 09:05 AM
The requested sign design calcs are included in the advertised bid package. MDT is transitioning to including the sign design calcs as part of the advertised package when they are available at advertising. A link to the advertised package is included below:
Advertised Bid Packages | Montana Department of Transportation (MDT)
-5-
Submitted: Thursday 02-OCT-2025 07:45 PM
Company: Prince, Inc.
Contact: Mike Sharp
1.) The last four projects in the Glendive District that have specified 3/8" Plant Mix have failed the Hamburg Rut Test. The specified depth of the 3/8" Plant Mix on this project is 0.10'. It is more of a wearing course than a structural component of the surfacing section. Would MDT be willing to waive the requirement of having a passing Hamburg Rut Test in order to mitigate that risk?
2.) The last overlay that we placed over a cold recycled section required great effort in order to get compaction. It ended up breaking up the cold recycled section under it in order to achieve density. This resulted in a rough end product. Would MDT be willing to go with a compaction standard established by test strip in order to avoid breaking up the section and potentially ending up with a rough end product?
Answer
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 03:53 PM
MDT will not waive the material requirements for this project in relation to the Hamburg Rut test and compaction requirements.
102 - SALTESE-EAST - October 09, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
-1-
Submitted: Tuesday 07-OCT-2025 01:30 PM
An Amendment has been posted for this project: AMENDMENT
To download the amendment bid files: Bid Express™ Secure Internet Bidding
Clarifications
-1-
Submitted: Thursday 25-SEP-2025 07:37 AM
After some review, MDT has discovered some errors with the signing plans.
The following plan sheets have been updated:
UPDATED SHEET 1
UPDATED SHEET 2
UPDATED SHEET 5
UPDATED SHEET 7
The following bid item quantities have been changed:
- 619010062, Signs-Alum Sheet Incr XI has been changed from 686.6 SQFT to 667.9 SQFT.
- 619010090, Signs-Alum Refl Sheet XI has been changed from 571.9 SQFT to 569.6 SQFT.
- 619010230, Remove Sign has been changed from 53 EACH to 54 EACH.
An amendment will be issued; updated bid files will be posted.
-2-
Submitted: Monday 29-SEP-2025 02:25 PM
An amendment will be issued for the following items; updated bid files will be posted.
Bid Item 402 020 097 ASPHALT BINDER PG 76-34 at 1,746.30 TON has been removed.
Bid Item 402 020 192 ASPHALT BINDER PG 58V-34 at 1746.30 TON has been added.
UPDATE
Submitted: Tuesday 30-SEP-2025 12:21 PM
The following plan sheets have been updated:
UPDATED SHEET 9
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Friday 19-SEP-2025 03:55 PM
Company: Knife River
Contact: Estimating
Would the Department consider making their pit off of Timber Creek Rd near the Haugan scale site available for aggregate production and hot plant site and production.
Answer:
Submitted: Wednesday 24-SEP-2025 08:05 AM
After careful consideration, the pit near Haugan scale site will not be available for aggregate production and a hot plant. MDT maintenance uses the site for salt sand production, and it is also occupied by MCS for their shooting range. Material is also limited in the pit.
-2-
Submitted: Monday 22-SEP-2025 11:44 AM
Company: Poteet Construction
Contact: Gary Pfister
Sheet 11 shows a detail with the guardrail post installed in the slope of the asphalt. Does this installation require the asphalt removal, gravel backfill and fog seal? If so, does this apply to all of the Reset Guardrail or can MDT give the contractor an approximate length of guardrail that will require this type of installation?
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 24-SEP-2025 08:35 AM
Guardrail posts may be placed directly through this thin layer of asphalt with no material needing to be removed behind the posts. Please refer to the third note on plan sheet 11. The only location anticipating any asphalt removal, millings backfill, and fog seal is the embankment aprons, and the plans have details and lengths of those aprons.
-3-
Submitted: Tuesday 23-SEP-2025 02:03 PM
Company: LHC
Contact: Sam Weyers
1. Would MDT consider an August 1, 2026 flex time NTP to allow for more favorable weather conditions at this location?
2. With respect to QA#2 above, will temporary barrier rail be required in each of the four locations to allow for guardrail removal, grading, shoulder gravel placement and resetting of guardrail or can this be completed with multiple day lane closure without edge protection as necessary?
3. Due to specialty nature of hand work and longer durations associated with SP#23, please add 15 days of contract time.
Answer
Submitted: Tuesday 30-SEP-2025 10:05 AM
1. The Notice to Proceed will remain as advertised.
2. Temporary Barrier Rail will be required for use in the four locations mentioned. The following Bid items are hereby added to the contract.
Bid Item 606011518 Temporary Impact Attenuator – 4 EACH
The following revised plan sheets 10-13 have been revised reflecting modifications. UPDATED PLAN SHEETS 10-13
An Amendment will be issued; updated bid files will be posted.
3. 15 working days will be added to the contract for a total of 55 working days. Special Provision # 2 Contract Time – Flex Time Proceed Date is hereby replaced with the following revised special provision. CONTRACT TIME-FLEX TIME
UPDATE:
Submitted: Friday 03-OCT-2025 07:40 AM
Plan sheet #10 has been updated due to a subsequent question.
10-3-2025 UPDATED PLAN SHEETS 10-13
-4-
Submitted: Thursday 25-SEP-2025 02:06 PM
Company: Mountain West Holding Company
Contact: Chris Connors
The project is specifying remove and reset of the guardrail at the idnetified areas. Would the MDOT consider revising to new installation for the following reasons: 1) Some of the existing wbeam is damaged and would need to be replaced, 2) The means and methods of installing wood posts would likely have a negative impact on the steep eroded shoulders causing more damage, 3) Hardware likely not reusable from the affects of magchloride, 4) May need to cut rail to get apart due to magchloride on hardware, 5) The new construction detail and steep shoulders will not leave any backfill gravel for wood post installation resulting in additional costs to import and place.
If the MDOT continues forward with resetting of guardrail, what are the requirements and expectations of cleaning the guardrail as mentioned in special provision 23? Notes on plan page 11 apply to guardrail posts installed through asphalt and state that installations that are too thick will require cutting out the asphalt when directed by the PM. Is it paid extra when directed by the MDT? Do the notes on sheet 11 only apply to guardrails that are not in aprons vs special provision 23.C.4 where it directs the contractor to peform cut outs in asphalt aprons at guardrail posts?
Answer
Submitted: Tuesday 30-SEP-2025 12:09 PM
Reset Guardrail has hereby been deleted from the contract. Installation of new MGS guardrail is hereby added to the contract.
The following bid items are deleted from the contract.
Bid Item 606 010 370 Reset guardrail 4,725 LNFT.
Bid item 606 010 385 Remove guardrail 4,725 LNFT.
The following bid items are hereby added to the contact.
Bid Item 606 010 330 MGS guardrail 4,725 LNFT.
Bid Item 606 010 386 Remove and Salvage guardrail 4,725 LNFT.
The following Special Provision is hereby added to the contract:
SALVAGE EXISTING GUARDRAIL
The following special provision is hereby modified:
SHOULDER REPAIR AND EMBANKMENT PROTECTOR
The following plans sheets have been revised:
UPDATED PLAN SHEETS 10-13
An amendment issued, bid files updated.
UPDATE:
Submitted: Wednesday 01-OCT-2025 09:36 AM
Asphalt removal is not anticipated for the majority of the shoulder repair areas. The only exception is the asphalt apron areas where guardrail pilot holes will be necessary. These pilot holes are incidental to the Plant Mix Bit Surf-Misc bid item. Any other location that requires asphalt removal and is not covered by Plant Mix Bit Surf-Misc, will be paid for as Miscellaneous Work.
UPDATE:
Submitted: Friday 03-OCT-2025 07:40 AM
Plan sheet #10 has been updated due to a subsequent question.
10-3-2025 UPDATED PLAN SHEETS 10-13
-5-
Submitted: Thursday 25-SEP-2025 02:40 PM
Company: Riverside Contracting, Inc.
Contact: Cale Fisher
Will MDT allow stockpiling cover material for the chip seal at their pit across from the weigh station?
Answer
Submitted: Friday 26-SEP-2025 10:47 AM
Stockpiling cover material at the MDT owned pit across from the Haugan rest area will be permitted. Coordinate with the project manager and district maintenance staff at least two weeks prior to delivery to determine and agree upon a stockpile location.
-6-
Submitted: Wednesday 01-OCT-2025 06:32 AM
Company: HighMark Traffic Services
Contact: Brad Meyer
Will MDT confirm the Temporary Striping quantities are accurate.
Answer
Submitted: Friday 03-OCT-2025 07:35 AM
The following bid item quantities have been changed:
620 012 955 Temporary Striping has been changed from 48,636 LNFT to 11,880 LNFT.
The following plan sheets have been updated. 10-3-2025 UPDATED PLAN SHEETS 10-13
An amendment will be issued; updated bid files will be posted.
-7-
Submitted: Wednesday 01-OCT-2025 04:42 PM
Company: Alpine Sign Inc
Contact: John
Please provide Sign Design Calculations for this project.
Answer
Submitted: Thursday 02-OCT-2025 11:52 AM
The sign design files for the requested project are posted here: SIGN DESIGN CALCS
The requested files are only design files. The Department cannot guarantee the accuracy of the electronic data, particularly as it may be called up by your computer, nor does any data in these files supersede the data in the contract documents. In addition, the Department will not make any revisions to the electronic files prior to award. Changes needed via change ordered work, or changes that are made during construction to fit field conditions, will be provided at that time. See the requirements of Subsection 619.03.2.
MDT is transitioning towards including the Sign Design Calcs as part of the advertised bid package, when applicable. Advertised Bid Packages are linked here: Advertised Bid Packages | Montana Department of Transportation (MDT)
103 - BUTTE AREA STP STRUCTURES - October 09, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
-1-
Submitted: Wednesday 08-OCT-2025 12:28 PM
An Amendment has been posted for this project: AMENDMENT
To download the amendment bid files: Bid Express™ Secure Internet Bidding
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Thursday 18-SEP-2025 03:08 PM
Company: Diamond Drilling & Sawing
Contact: Eric Blackburn
The full as-built drawing set for Structure 04454- Burlington St over I-90 is missing from the bid docs. Please provide.
Answer
Submitted: Friday 19-SPE-2025 12:36 PM
The files linked below represent the as-built drawings for the structures. MDT provides them for informational purposes only. They do not include drawings for modifications to the structures, such as joint replacements and guardrail revisions and may not completely represent current conditions. Thus, some of the information contained in these documents may be out of date or not applicable with regard to the advertised project. The contractor should not rely solely on the as-built drawings provided for bidding purposes nor does any data in these files supersede the data in the contract documents. AS BUILT DRAWINGS
-2-
Submitted: Tuesday 23-SEP-2025 03:24 PM
Company: Hamilton Construction Co.
Contact: Wendell Snook
Regarding Schedule of Items Line No. 0100 Test Trailer - Trasport and Setup. - Has MDT identified a site for the trailer to be setup? - Is the contractor required to provide power, water or other utilities? If so, how is this paid?
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 24-SEP-2025 03:26 PM
The test trailer for this bid item will be moved from the MDT Butte office to the hot plant selected by the successful bidder and returned to the MDT Butte office as directed. Please refer to MDT standard specifications 210.03.6 Test Trailer, Transport, and Setup and 210.04.2 Test Trailer, Transport, and Setup. Test trailer, transport, and setup is measured by the mile for the actual miles moved. It includes insurance, transporting, blocking, unblocking, leveling, furnishing, and installing electrical power and associated wiring, removing power and wiring, and all other necessary resources to complete the item of work.
A field laboratory trailer as specified in MDT standard specification 106.05 FIELD LABORATORY will be required for concrete testing on this project as well.
-3-
Submitted: Monday 29-SEP-2025 02:08 PM
Company: Sletten Construction
Contact: Russ Robertson
After analyzing the project schedule and the amount of work required for the Contractor to perform on this project, especially taking in account the historic delays when working in and around railroad property, would MDT consider extending the contract time to 150 working days or a whole construction season? When considering this time extension, also consider you are asking the Contractor to build crossovers in springtime in Butte, which has also, historically, been difficult with spring snow and rain storms.
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 01-OCT-2025 07:06 AM
An additional 25 working days will be added to the contract for a total of 125 days. Special provision #2, Contract Time is hereby replaced with the following linked provision: CONTRACT TIME
-4-
Submitted: Friday 03-OCT-2025 03:18 PM
Company: Sletten Construction
Contact: Ian McIntosh
Special Provision 52, Traffic Control and Sequence of Operations, states that all work on Shields Ave must be completed before any other area of the project is worked on. What is the reason for this? The scope of work on Shields Avenue is minimal, in the overall scope of the project, and is largely temperature dependent. So doing this work in April, at the start of the construction season, when the weather in Butte is not as favorable, will cause a longer closure due to weather limitations and have a greater impact on the traveling public. Please consider allowing work on other aspects of the project prior to, or concurrently, with the work on Shields Ave, with the understanding that work at Shields Ave will be completed as swiftly as possible once the closure is in place.
Answer
Submitted: Tuesday 07-OCT-2025 04:02PM
Special Provision No. 52 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SEQUENCE OF OPERATIONS, is rescinded. The linked special provision TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SEQUENCE OF OPERATIONS is herby incorporated into the contract.
-5-
Submitted: Sunday 05-OCT-2025 03:30 PM
Company: Mountain West Holding Company
Contact: Chris Connors
Plan sheet 20 covering Str 02690 includes a note stating to retain and protect existing approach guardrail. At the bottom of the page, there is another note with details to remove and salvage all the guardrail and that it is paid under Remove & Salvage Guardrail. The guardrail summary on sheet 6 does not include any quantities for this structure nor is there a bid item Remove and Salvage Guardrail. Please clarify what information applies to structure 02690.
Answer
Submitted: Tuesday 07-OCT-2025 04:41PM
Note #2 – Does not apply to sheet 20, disregard.
UPDATE
Submitted: Wednesday 08-OCT-2025 09:43 AM
Revised sheet 20 is hereby incorporated into this contract. REVISED SHEET 20
-6-
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 07:13 AM
Company: Mountain West Holding Company
Contact: Chris Connors
The project provides some remarks for the intended layout of the guardrails on Burlington Street. Has the Department confirmed that the provided information is accurate and items shown will fit the site? MASH Bridge Approaches and MASH Terminals can not be built with a radius and it does not appear that the requested layout will fit without revising the current geometry of the roadway.
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 08-OCT-2025 11:48 AM
The quantity for bid item 606 010 342 MASH THRIE BEAM BR APPRCH SECTION has been decreased to 6 Each.
The quantity for bid item 606 010 330 MGS GUARDRAIL has been increased to 1585.2 LNFT.
The quantity for bid Item 606 010 150 GUARDRAIL-STL/BR APPR-TY 1 has been increased to 6 Each.
An amendment will be issued; updated bid files will be posted. The following revised summary sheets reflects changes and the associated quantity revisions. REVISED SHEET 6 and SHEET 19
-7-
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 08:40 AM
Company: Mountain West Holding Company
Contact: Chris Connors
The guardrail summary requires the contractor to remove guardrail in the median of both EB & WB I-90 for the new crossover at MM 227.47. Should there be temporary terminals to protect the blunt ends of the guardrail left in place?
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 08-OCT-2025 10:12 AM
Positive terminal end protection is required for any partially removed sections of guardrail. Temporary optional terminal sections will need to be installed at these locations. Include the cost of the temporary optional terminal sections in the lump sum bid item crossover construct maintain, remove.
-8-
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 09:47 AM
Company: Mountain West Holding Company
Contact: Chris Connors
The notes applicable to High Tension Cable Rail on sheet 7 and information shown on sheet 11 do not make sense. The notes indicate that only the anchor block is considered for the price of the High-Tension Cable Rail Terminal Section and that Anchor Posts are paid under the High-Tension Cable Rail. Crossover #2 would have equal removal and installation which works out. Crossover #1 shows the installation of the new run to overlap the existing which should result in increased quantity of new vs removal in addition to the Terminal Posts necessary for the exiting runs. Please confirm that the payment of High-Tension Cable Rail will start at the end of the concrete terminal block and extend to the final post placed or the concrete block at the other end, as applicable.
Answer
Submitted Wednesday 08-OCT-2025 11:38 AM
Cable Rail is paid as shown in the details and plans, excluding the 40’ Terminal Section, which is paid separately.
For Crossover #1 at RP 227.79, new High-Tension Cable Rail can be reduced to 1,091 LNFT and 68 Anchor Posts.
The following revised plans sheets reflect changes and the associated quantity revisions: REVISED SHEET 7, SHEET 11, and SHEET 12
The quantity for HIGH-TENSION CABLE RAIL 606 010 117 is hereby decreased to 1,564 LNFT.
An amendment will be issued, updated bid files will be posted.
104 - HELENA-EAST & SF 199 EAST HELENA HFST - October 09, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
-1-
Submitted: Tuesday 07-OCT-2025 01:31 PM
An Amendment has been posted for this project: AMENDMENT
To download the amendment bid files: Bid Express™ Secure Internet Bidding
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Monday 22-SEP-2025 04:04 PM
Company: Poteet Construction
Contact: Gary Pfister
What is the scope of work for RESET BRIDGE APPROACH SECTION? Do the posts have to be removed and reset or just the rail?
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 24-SEP-2025 01:20 PM
Bid Item #606 011 288 RESET BRIDGE APPROACH SECTION is hereby removed from the contract.
Bid Item #606 010 150 GUARDRAIL-STL/BR APPR-TY 1 is hereby added to the contract with a quantity of 4 EACH.
An amendment will be issued, updated bid files will be posted.
UPDATE
Submitted: Friday 03-OCT-2025 09:15 AM
See response to Question #3
-2-
Submitted: Wednesday 24-SEP-2025 12:19 PM
Company: Diamond Drilling & Sawing
Contact: Eric E Blackburn
Do the asphalt to concrete joints get sealed? Specifically, do the joints between the asphalt shoulders and concrete lanes and the joints between the asphalt median and concrete lanes get sealed? The quantities included in the PCCP Joint & Crack Sealing table on Sheet 03 appear they do. If the joints do get sealed, there is not a detail on how to construct a joint between asphalt and concrete.
Answer
Submitted: Friday 26-SEP-2025 11:20 AM
Prepare the joints between the asphalt shoulder/median and PCCP using a ¾” wide router along with other provisions in the contract. Route the asphalt to sufficient depth to remove any debris next to the PCCP and seal with approved joint seal material.
-3-
Submitted: Wednesday 01-OCT-2025 07:53 AM
Company: Mountain West Holding Company
Contact: Chris Connors
Referencing a previous Q&A answer that cancelled Reset Bridge Approaches and added new Bridge Approaches. Does the Remarks Modified Bridge Approach still apply? If so, what is the necessary modification? The curb on and off the bridge do not appear to be typical for Type 1 Bridge Approaches. Is the curb off the bridge free standing and able to be removed or is it monolithic or tied to other parts of an approach slab? Should the curb off the bridge be left in place or is it the Department intent to pour a curb to match what is on the bridge?
Answer
Submitted: Friday 03-OCT-2025 07:13 AM
The intent is to remove existing Guardrail Bridge Approach sections and replace with new Guardrail Bridge Approach sections using steel posts. The concrete curb sections are able to be removed, and new curb sections will be required.
Project right (East Bound) remove the existing guardrail bridge approach sections and replace each with a Type 3 guardrail bridge approach section.
Project left (West Bound) remove the existing guardrail bridge approach sections and replace each with a Type 2 guardrail bridge approach section.
Bid Item # 606 010 230 GUARDRAIL-STL/BR APPR-TY 3 is hereby added to the contract with a quantity of 2 EACH.
Bid Item # 606 010 190 GUARDRAIL-STL/BR APPR-TY 2 is hereby added to the contract with a quantity of 2 EACH.
Bid Item # 606 010 150 GUARDRAIL-STL/BR APPR-TY 1 is hereby removed from the contract.
Road Plans Sheets No. 4 & 7 have been updated: SHEETS 4 & 7
An amendment will be issued, updated bid files will be posted.
-4-
Submitted: Wednesday 01-OCT-2025 08:02 AM
Company: Mountain West Holding Company
Contact: Chris Connors
Sprecial provision 24 references both bridge and road guardrail but there is no work on this contract that would affect the guardrail systems on either of the two bridges. Does this provision apply to the guardrails off the bridge? The provision also mentions salvage to the Bridger Maint Yard but there is no other information in the contract with specific requirements for that salvage. The white painted guardrail is identified on site and not of concern per the provision. Is there grey painted guardrail off the bridge (as referenced to contain lead) and is it different from the galvanized guardrail which is also grey? Part C. 2) apears to apply only to "bridge guardrail". Is there guardrail off the bridges that contains lead that must be addressed?
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 01-OCT-2025 03:30 PM
Both bridge and road guardrail information are provided as the special provision applies to both guardrail types. Work only includes road guardrail which is both white and gray. Road guardrail including the bridge approach sections are either grey or connect to the grey lead painted guardrail. Grey painted guardrail is different from galvanized guardrail. Properly dispose of all grey lead painted guardrail per the special provision.
Salvage and haul terminal ends and concrete posts to the Lincoln Road maintenance pit. Contact Mike Day at (406) 431-1828 two weeks before removal and coordinate details for delivery to MDT maintenance.
-5-
Submitted: Thursday 02-OCT-2025 02:17 PM
Company: Acme Concrete Paving
Contact: Kevin Schneider
Please review Table 2 under Special Provision 28 - Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Grinding. The MRI requirements in the table appear to have an error in them, providing requirements that are not applicable to the work. Please review and correct this table.
Answer
Submitted: Friday 03-OCT-2025 10:15 AM
The special provision had been revised reflecting modifications.
Special Provision #28 Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Grinding is hereby replaced with the following special provision: PCCP GRINDING
105 - HAVRE-URBAN (NHS) - October 09, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
-1-
Submitted: Tuesday 07-OCT-2025 01:33 PM
An Amendment has been posted for this project: AMENDMENT
To download the amendment bid files: Bid Express™ Secure Internet Bidding
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Wednesday 24-SEP-2025 01:48 PM
Company: Diamond Drilling & Sawing
Contact: Eric Blackburn
In the PCCP Joint & Crack Sealing table on Sheet No 3, the quantity for Joint Back of Curb appears to run the full length of the project on both sides of the roadway, which is an expansion joint. Sheet No 5 includes a detail for PCCP Joints and Cracks located in the roadway only. Sheet No 7 for the curb repair work includes an Expansion Joint Detail. Is it the intent of MDT to reconstruct the 27,779.70 LF Joint Back of Curb per the Expansion Joint Detail and per Option 1 as shown on Sheet No 7?
Answer
Submitted: Thursday 25-SEP-2025 01:03 PM
No, the expansion joint detail only applies to curb repair. For joint sealing at the back of existing curb follow the special provision and plan detail for PCCP Joint Seal.
-2-
Submitted: Wednesday 24-SEP-2025 02:11 PM
Company: Diamond Drilling & Sawing
Contact: Eric Blackburn
On Sheet No 3 within the PCCP Joint & Crack Sealing table the 13,109.30 LF of Other Public Street Aprons (26) and Isolation Joints listed. What is MDT is considering the isolation joints to be? The joint between the concrete apron and asphalt side street? If so, please provide a detail of how to construct a joint between asphalt and concrete.
Answer
Submitted: Thursday 25-SEP-2025 01:04 PM
Isolation joints are generally located around manholes and storm inlets. There is no requirement to seal the transverse asphalt to concrete joints on either mainline or side streets.
-3-
Submitted: Wednesday 01-OCT-2025 01:10 PM
Company: Acme Concrete Paving
Contact: Kevin Schneider
Existing pavement markings are inlaid tape. This must be removed prior to the diamond grinding work. Will MDT consider adding a bid item for this work?
Answer
Submitted: Thursday 02-OCT-2025 02:13 PM
Bid Item # 620 013 956 REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKINGS is hereby added to the contract with a quantity of 2.4 MILES
An amendment will be issued, updated bid files will be posted.
UPDATE
Submitted: Tuesday 07-OCT-2025 09:50 PM
Plan sheet #4 has been updated to include REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKINGS bid item: SHEET 4
-4-
Submitted: Thursday 02-OCT-2025 02:20 PM
Company: Acme Concrete Paving
Contact: Kevin Schneider
This Contract does not include a special provision for the Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Grinding - nor do the 2025 Standard Specifications have a specification for this work. Please reference Call No 104 - Helena East on this same bid letting for a current Special Provision that is likely applicable. Please review and provide a special provision specifically for this Contract.
Answer
Submitted: Friday 03-OCT-2025 06:42 AM
The following special provision is hereby added to the contract: PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT GRINDING
-5-
Submitted: Sunday 05-OCT-2025 12:33 PM
Company: Alpine Sign Inc
Contact: John
Please provide Sign Design Calculations for this project
Answer
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 08:35 AM
The sign design files for the requested project are posted here: SIGN DESIGN CALCS The requested files are only design files. The Department cannot guarantee the accuracy of the electronic data, particularly as it may be called up by your computer, nor does any data in these files supersede the data in the contract documents. In addition, the Department will not make any revisions to the electronic files prior to award. Changes needed via change ordered work, or changes that are made during construction to fit field conditions, will be provided at that time. See the requirements of Subsection 619.03.2.
106 - ROY-WEST - October 09, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Wednesday 01-OCT-2025 04:45 PM
Company: Alpine Sign Inc
Contact: John
Please provide Sign Design Calculations for this project.
Answer
Submitted: Thursday 02-OCT-2025 10:37 AM
The sign design files for the requested project are posted here: SIGN DESIGN CALCS
The requested files are only design files. The Department cannot guarantee the accuracy of the electronic data, particularly as it may be called up by your computer, nor does any data in these files supersede the data in the contract documents. In addition, the Department will not make any revisions to the electronic files prior to award. Changes needed via change ordered work, or changes that are made during construction to fit field conditions, will be provided at that time. See the requirements of Subsection 619.03.2.
MDT is transitioning towards including the Sign Design Calcs as part of the advertised bid package, when applicable. Advertised Bid Packages are linked here: Advertised Bid Packages | Montana Department of Transportation (MDT)
107 - SF 229 D1 I-90 STRIPING 6 IN - October 09, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Thursday 02-OCT-2025 10:56 AM
Company: Streamline Markings
Contact: Mike Ryan
I have questions regarding Special provisions 24.C.4 and 24.C.4.a. Grooving. Furnish a self-propelled grooving machine equipped with stacked diamond cutting blades to perform the work. Furnish a machine capable of providing uniform depth and alignment. Do not use grinder type heads. Are PCD heads approved?
a) Provide a groove depth of 120 mils ± 10mils. This looks like a spec for tape application. I think it is in the best interest of the department to require a groove depth of 30 to 40 mils. Anything deeper than that collects water and residue which creates a loss of reflectivity.
Answer
Submitted: Friday 03-OCT-2025 02:15 PM
Submit the grinding system to the Project Manager for approval, the intent is to leave a uniform stripe groove for pavement marking application meeting the requirements of the special provision. Alternative grinding methods will be required to demonstrate this ability of uniform groove, a 2000-foot test section will be required to prove the performance of the grinding equipment. Unacceptable groove appearance includes but is not limited to undulations in the groove in the direction of travel, perpendicular to the direction of travel, as well as grooves that detrimentally affect the final pavement marking application. Do not grind ahead of the test section until approval is granted from the Project Manager.
The groove depth of 120 mills will not be changed.
108 - I-15 FENCING-MELROSE AREA - October 09, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
-1-
Submitted: Tuesday 07-OCT-2025 01:36 PM
An Amendment has been posted for this project: AMENDMENT
To download the amendment bid files: Bid Express™ Secure Internet Bidding
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Friday 12-SEP-2025 07:34 AM
Company: Montana Fence Co.
Contact: Eric Wutke
In regard to the 8 foot tall wildlife fencing. Would the M.D.O.T. Consider a design change to a metal panel and steel line post-game fence system? The reasons are 1. Steel save the M.D.O.T. Costs long term in maintenance and replacement. Wood posts decay overtime and the fence will need to be replaced. 2. Steel fences will not burn in a fire. 3. The area where this fence is being installed in a river bottom corridor which has very rocky gravelly soil. Metal fence posts drive and remain stable in rocky soils more efficiently than would and are less apt to be compromised in the installation. Question 2. Has the department factored in the line of fence footage twice through the single panels on the 8-foot wildlife fence? The wire is stretch twice through the panels going both directions and is paid twice. In the past the department has not had this footage in the line of fence quantities and has had cost overruns of 15’x the # of panels on the projects. Please recalculate footage. This would apply to both wood and steel fence systems.
Answer
Submitted: Friday 26-SEP-2025 08:55 AM
1. Wood posts will be required for this project.
2. The fencing will be paid once through the single panel. New fence is measured by the foot. The measurements are made on the fence line along the top wire or rail or along a line parallel thereto, from end post to end post including wing fences to structures.
-2-
Submitted: Friday 12-SEP-2025 07:10 AM
Company: Montana Fence co.
Contact: Eric Wutke
Regarding bid items 607100149, 607100360 and 607100380. The M.D.O.T. Has designated wood line posts and brace panel systems. It is our professional opinion the there is greater benefits to switch from wood posts to steel line posts and steel panels (M.D.O.T. Drawing 607-5). We ask the M.D.O.T. To consider a change. Here are our reasons. 1. The project site is in a dry fire prone area. We have been replacing fire-burned wood fence around the state of Montana with steel fences and panels and believe it would be wise to do so on this project. 2. Steel post do not rot and decay. Saving maintenance and replacement costs. Steel post tend to pound in, through and around the rocks that will be encountered on this job. While wood posts are more apt to explode while pounding. They are also not as able to get to depth in rock. 3. Steel fence is easier for maintenance to maintain and the Department has called out the 607-5 detail on the majority of jobs in recent years. Will the state consider a change to these bid items?
Answer
Submitted: Friday 26-SEP-2025 08:57 AM
Wood posts will be required for this project.
-3-
Submitted: Friday 12-SEP-2025 07:23 AM
Company: Montana Fence
Contact: Eric Wutke
In analyzing the brace panel quantities for 607100360 and 607100380 as well as looking at where they are called out on the plans, would the M.D.O.T. Recalculate the quantities as they appear to be inaccurate. Per drawing 607-10, Single panels are used for cross fences as well as at starting points and ending points. Double panels are installed at max spacing of 660 feet on woven wire fences as well as at angle changes and at the top and bottom of hills. In all recent projects double panels far exceed single panels in total quantity.
Answer
Submitted: Monday 29-SEP-2025 10:00 AM
The original plans were based on as-built data and existing conditions. Modifications to panel layout may be required based on the existing terrain. Final layout to be approved by the project manager.
The following revised plan sheets 4 and 10-18 have been revised reflecting modifications to the single and double panels and the associated quantity revisions. PLAN SHEETS 4, 10-18
The quantity for item FARM FENCE-PANEL/DOUBLE FW 607 100 380 has been updated to 224 EACH.
The quantity for item FARM FENCE-PANEL/SINGLE FW 607 100 360 has been updated to 114 EACH.
An amendment will be issued; updated bid files will be posted.
-4-
Submitted: Saturday 20-SEP-2025 08:08 AM
Company: Wapiti Peak Contractors
Contact: Lee Carter
Would the state consider reevaluating the gradation requirements on the foundation material for the Wildlife Jumpouts? These requirements are not achievable. The last two jobs completed in the Missoula and Butte districts have requested the same gradation, however, 100% passsing the 1/2 inch and 5% passing the #200 has not been achievable. The department, on both projects prior, did accept a less stringent, yet very clean material as a substitute. Could the gradation requirements be changed, or would an approved substitute be accepted?
Answer
Submitted: Monday 29-SEP-2025 10:57 AM
Special Provision No. 19, WILDLIFE JUMPOUTS, is rescinded. The Special Provision WILDLIFE JUMPOUTS is hereby incorporated into the contract.
UPDATED: Monday 29-SEP-2025 01:05 PM
Attached are PDF Files of the available project alignment and/or structures geotechnical report(s), geotechnical report supplements, and geotechnical laboratory summaries. There is remaining geotechnical information that is voluminous and very difficult to compile in a concise manner. Contractors are welcome to come to MDT Headquarters to inspect rock samples taken for the project that are stored here or to look through the complete set of Geotechnical field investigation notes, laboratory testing, analytical, or other data in our project files. It should be noted that the project may have undergone significant changes during the design process after the original geotechnical report and supplements were issued. Thus, some of the information contained in these documents may be out of date or not applicable with regard to the advertised project. Some of the changes include but are not limited to: Project splits (for funding, ROW issues, etc.) alignment and grade changes; and changes due to environmental factors (sensitive areas, etc.).
The document links can be found below:
BORING LOGS AND KEY
GEOTECH REPORTS AND LAB SUMMARY
-5-
Submitted: Wednesday 24-SEP-2025 11:47 AM
Company: Montana Fence
Contact: Jon Likes
Pertaining to the wildlife fencing portion. Currently there are no new cattle guards being installed. Typically with wildlife exclusion fences, cattle guards would be replaced with double wide cattle guards to prevent wildlife from jumping inside the exclusion area. The current cattle guards that are in place are only single wide. Please advise.
Answer
Submitted: Friday 26-SEP-2025 08:59 AM
The existing cattleguards are to remain in place.
-6-
Submitted: Wednesday 24-SEP-2025 11:54 AM
Company: Montana Fence
Contact: Jon Likes
On the Right side of the job at station number 185 + 09.60 there is a concrete canal right next to the fence-line. Currently there are gaps in the existing fence where the canal has a concrete wall that is currently as tall as a jump out. Then there is a section of fence installed rock backfill behind the concrete wall where it is shorter. Would attaching a chainlink fence to the top of this concrete wall to achieve the height requirement for this short stretch be an acceptable alternative to installing wildlife fence in loose rock behind the concrete wall?
Answer
Submitted: Monday 29-SEP-2025 10:35 AM
Chain link fence will not be allowed to be attached to the concrete wall. Wildlife fencing is to be installed in the plan location or as approved by the project manager.
-7-
Submitted: Thursday 25-SEP-2025 07:17 AM
Company: Montana Fence
Contact: Eric Wutke
The detailed drawing for the jump outs shows a double panel installation. Is this included in the double panel quantities, or is it incidental to the cost of the jump out?
Answer
Submitted: Friday 26-SEP-2025 09:00 AM
The double panel installation for the jump outs is included in the double panel quantities in the Summary Frame Fencing (Exclusionary).
-8-
Submitted: Thursday 25-SEP-2025 08:04 AM
Company: Montana Fence
Contact: Eric Wutke
In the special provisions variable message boards have been called out. On past projects, traffic control has been handled with two road work ahead signs facing traffic at both ends of the job. All fencing and jump out activity is generally handled with a shoulder closure and reduced speed signage as well as an occasional lane closure while fencing on underpasses and frontage roads. As currently proposed this project will not require road closures or detours as the majority of the work is in the right of way. Would the M.D.O.T. Consider not using variable message boards to save project costs?
Secondly. If the M.D.O.T. Ads cattle guards to the project, variable message boards would be needed for a short time while the cattle guards are being installed on the on ramp and off ramp as there would be a brief road closures.
Answer
Submitted: Friday 26-SEP-2025 09:02 AM
Variable message boards will be required for this project.
-9-
Submitted: Monday 29-SEP-2025 01:04 PM
Company: Montana Fence
Contact: Jon Likes
In response to the answer for question 6, the soil condition behind the concrete ditch is currently large boulders loosely stacked as backfill. The ditch has high sides and is 4-5' wide. Does the state have a plan for how to install those posts so that they remain in place. Keep in mind it is virtually impossible to get any piece of equipment to this location, and it will need to be installed completely by hand. It could benefit the state significantly to have a clear plan for this location; this would limit a change order in field if a clear plan was put in place. One solution would be to attach the fence to the top of the concrete ditch bank.
Answer
Submitted: Tuesday 30-SEP-2025 03:00 PM
Please see response to Question #6.
-10-
Submitted: Tuesday 30-SEP-2025 07:27 PM
Company: Wapiti Peak Contractors
Contact: Lee Carter
Will we be required to submit a set of stamped engineered drawings from the block manufacturer for MDT approval before work can begin on the jump outs?
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 01-OCT-2025 08:25 AM
In accordance with special provision Wildlife Jump outs, Submit complete design calculations and working drawings to the Project Manager for review a minimum of 20 working days before the planned start of wall excavation and/or construction.
-11-
Submitted: Wednesday 01-OCT-2025 01:16 PM
Company: Montana Fence
Contact: Jon Likes
In regards to answer number 2 on question #1. On a single wildlife panel there are two top wires stretched from either brace post going both directions. On all previous projects the wire has been measured twice through the single panels. This ads an additional 780’ linear feet of fencing material and labor. Please reevaluate the answer to this question. Per precedence 780’ of fence should be added to the bid item.
Answer
Submitted: Thursday 02-OCT-2025 02:11 PM
The fence will be measured and paid once through single panels. The measurements are made on the fence line along the top wire or rail or along a line parallel thereto. Please bid accordingly.
201 - CLARK FORK/OLD HWY 10 BRIDGES - October 23, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Friday 26-SEP-2025 12:34 PM
Company: Sundt Construction
Contact: Joe Padon
Where are the additional geo-tech information located?
Has there been a sieve analysis and shear test completed on the existing material onsite, within the new bridge shadow?
Answer
Submitted: Tuesday 30-SEP-2025 12:28 PM
Attached are PDF Files of the available project alignment and/or structures geotechnical report(s), geotechnical report supplements, and geotechnical laboratory summaries. There is remaining geotechnical information that is voluminous and very difficult to compile in a concise manner. Contractors are welcome to come to MDT Headquarters 2511 Holman Avenue, Billings, MT 59102 to inspect rock samples taken for the project that are stored here or to look through the complete set of Geotechnical field investigation notes, laboratory testing, analytical, or other data in our project files. It should be noted that the project may have undergone significant changes during the design process after the original geotechnical report and supplements were issued. Thus, some of the information contained in these documents may be out of date or not applicable with regard to the advertised project. Some of the changes include, but are not limited to: Project splits (for funding, ROW issues, etc.) alignment and grade changes; and changes due to environmental factors (sensitive areas, etc.). The documents can be found at: GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS
One shear test was performed on Boring ST-7.
UPDATED
Submitted: Thursday 09-OCT-2025 11:32 AM
Please see address change above.
-2-
Submitted: Sunday 28-SEP-2025 12:58 PM
Company: Omega Caisson Drilling Inc.
Contact: NICK A LUDWIG
Is there a spec for the permanent casing embedment into the bedrock?
Who makes the determination of when to advance the bottom of casing beyond the design elevations?
Is casing installation method at the contractors discretion?
Are spin bottom buckets allowed for shaft cleanout if wet or loose soils are present?
Answer
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 02:35 PM
1. Not specifically. The estimated tip elevations are shown on the drawings but may be subject to variation based on the conditions encountered. Install the permanent casing to facilitate stable excavation, cleaning, inspection, and quality concrete placement.
2. The Contractor is ultimately responsible for satisfying the requirements set forth in the contract documents. The decision of where to terminate the permanent casing is anticipated to be a collaborative effort between the Contractor, MDT’s Project Manager, and a Geotechnical engineer. Address this important item in the required installation plan submitted for approval, as well as discussed in the shaft pre-construction meeting.
3. Yes, subject to the requirements of the contract documents and as approved in the required installation plan.
4. Yes, spin bottom buckets may be used to help with the cleanout, although per Special Provision #57, an airlift or other approved equal is required for the final cleanout.
-3-
Submitted: Tuesday 30-SEP-2025 03:25 PM
Company: Battle Ridge Builders
Contact: Cody Ham
Requiring traffic back on the bridge October 2026 means that there will be no demolition taking place in 2026 and just some deep foundation and access work. That leaves 150 working days to remove and replace a tall 800 foot bridge with difficult access and environmental concerns. That is not sufficient time. Just cure time alone will use almost 30 percent of these days. Please consider a more permanent detour that allows work through the 26-27 winter so demolition can start in 2026.
Answer
Submitted: Friday 03-OCT-2025 07:00 AM
Bid the project as advertised.
-4-
Submitted: Thursday 02-OCT-2025 12:17 PM
Company: Sundt Construction
Contact: Joe Padon
With such a short time to construct the new bridge, will working hours between 6 am to 10 pm be eliminated to allow double shifting?
Answer
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 10:38 AM
Special Provision # 34 Noise Impact is hereby removed from the contract. Double shifting will be allowed.
-5-
Submitted: Saturday 04-OCT-2025 11:45 AM
Company: Sundt
Contact: Joe Padon
Clarify the structure for which section 1 Paragraph 21 sentence E is reffering to. There appears to be be now drawings for the work in Section 1 Paragraph 21 subsection 2 sentence D and what is required under this contract.
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 08-OCT-2025 09:07AM
Special Provision #21 is for structure 01377 and 01379. Special Provision 21. C. 2). d) does not apply to this project.
-6-
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 02:02 PM
Company: Alpine Sign Inc
Contact: John
Can MDT please address the sizes shown in the Signing and Delineation Summary for R5-1A at Stations 99+19 LT & 99+49 RT
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 08-OCT-2025 09:39 AM
The R5-1A sign size has been updated to 42”X30” for both locations. Updated plan sheets S1 and S2 can be viewed here: SHEETS S1 & S2
The affected Bid Item is hereby revised as follows:
619 010 090 SIGNS-ALUM REFL SHEET XI – 89.9 SQFT
An amendment will be issued, updated bid files will be posted.
-7-
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 04:52 PM
Company: DBM Contractors, Inc.
Contact: Ryan Thody
Who should we contact for setting up a visit to view the rock core samples for this project? Please provide an address of where the samples are located.
Answer
Submitted: Thursday 09-OCT-2025 11:25 AM
Contractors can contact Dustin Hutzenbiler at (406) 652-3930 or via email at dhutzenbiler@skgeotechnical.com to schedule a date and time to view the core samples. Samples are located at 2511 Holman Avenue, Billings, Montana 59102, and are available for viewing Monday through Friday, between 9:00 AM and 4:00 PM. Please provide a minimum of three business days’ advance notice.
-8-
Submitted: Tuesday 07-OCT-2025 09:39 AM
Company: Hamilton Construction
Contact: Casey Shaw
SP 42 says "Remove the entire existing structure including but not limited to the deck slabs, beams, bridge rails, curbs, end bents, intermediate piers, foundations, and all incidental items." Drawing B4 shows the in-water piers being removed 3' below grade. Does the 3' below grade removal apply to the other piers, as well as the abutments or are they to be removed in their entirety? If the latter, then it appears shoring would be needed on the west side as well as the east, even though B4 only shows it on the east. Please advise.
Answer
Submitted: Friday 10-OCT-2025 09:07 AM
Remove existing Piers Nos. 4 and 5 in accordance with Special Provision 42 – Remove Structure. Remove all other substructures in accordance with Subsection 202.03.1.B. Removal of Substructures.
-9-
Submitted: Tuesday 07-OCT-2025 09:41 AM
Company: Hamilton Construction
Contact: Casey Shaw
The second season on this project requires more work to be accomplished by 10/29/27 than time allows for, especially when considering cure times. Would MDT be open to adding a third season to complete demo, remove access, and finish incidental work, assuming we were able to get the bridge open to traffic by 10/29/27 to make the schedule possible?
Answer
Submitted: Friday 10-OCT-2025 09:24 AM
Per special provision #2, the contract changes to a working day contract after October 29, 2027. For clarification, no working days would be charged during the winter period and up until the seal coat dates if the demo and removal of access work have no impact on the traveling public. Special Provision #2 Contract Time – Completion Date is hereby replaced with the following special provision: CONTRACT TIME - COMPLETION DATE
-10-
Submitted: Tuesday 07-OCT-2025 09:46 AM
Company: Hamilton Construction
Contact: Casey Shaw
SP 13 states that the contract time will be increased by 10 calendar days for those who attended the pre-bid networking conference. Do those 10 additional days eliminate incurring disincentives and liquidated damage during that time?
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 08-OCT-2025 10:19 AM
Road User Costs would apply from October 29, 2027 through November 8, 2027, and Liquidated Damages would apply after November 8, 2027 for a successful bidder who has attended the pre-bid networking conference on November 18, 2024. Road User Costs and Liquidated Damages would not be combined or added together after November 8, 2027.
-11-
Submitted: Tuesday 07-OCT-2025 09:44 AM
Company: Hamilton Construction
Contact: Casey Shaw
Do liquidated damages, as shown on Table 108-4 of the Standard Specs, apply in addition to $4300/day disincentive if traffic is not switched out of crossover configurations by 10/29/27?
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 08-OCT-2025 10:16 AM
Liquidated Damages will apply after October 29, 2027 per special provision 4.C.3). The assessment of Liquidated Damages and Road User Costs will not be combined or added together after October 29, 2027.
-12-
Submitted: Tuesday 07-OCT-2025 11:12 AM
Company: Battle Ridge Builders
Contact: Cody Ham
Will the state allow Clearcast deck forms for this deck? They are clear so they will allow for state inspection. These forms would shorten construction time and make the work significantly more safe for our crews as this bridge is very tall.
Answer
Submitted Thursday 09-OCT-2025 8:47 AM
Stay in place forms are not permitted. Bid the project as advertised.
-13-
Submitted: Tuesday 07-OCT-2025 05:34 PM
Company: Garco Construction, Inc.
Contact: Tim Loucks
Per SP 22, Page 16 RAILROAD COORDINATION AND FLAGGING. 1) The referenced site does not contain any standard agreements, just an application process. Please provide standard "C" and "C-1" agreements relative to the project. 2) Please confirm if MDT will provide compensation for providing RR Protective Liability Insurance per 107.07 or if this cost is to be borne by the Contractor.
Answer
Submitted: Thursday 09-OCT-2025 8:50 AM
The “C” and “C-1” agreements are Railroad agreements, not MDT agreements. Follow the stated electronic permitting process with the railroad to gain permission, ensure proper insurance levels, and coordination of possible flagging. MDT will provide compensation to the contractor for providing RR Protective Liability Insurance per 107.07.
-14-
Submitted: Thursday 09-OCT-2025 07:41 PM
Company: Sundt
Contact: Joe Padon
Section 55 Paint Existing Structural Steel Paragraph D sentence 4 states "Repair areas subject to pack rust as identified by the Project manager"
How can a contractor quantify the amount of pack rust to be removed if no quantity is given?
-15-
Submitted: Thursday 09-OCT-2025 07:52 PM
Company: Sundt
Contact: Joe Padon
In Spec Section 55 paragraph D sentence 4 sub section a) Notify the project manager of locations not identified on the Plans were built-up steel sections are deformed over 1/4" due to pack rust. Repair these areas as directed by the Project Manager.
Please clarify the plans being referred to and what the repair will consist of for proper pricing of this bid item.
-16-
Submitted: Friday 10-OCT-2025 10:25 AM
Company: Sundt
Contact: Joe Padon
There isn't a grading plan sheet for the east side of the river under the bridge, will one be provided?
-17-
Submitted: Friday 10-OCT-2025 06:13 PM
Company: Sundt
Contact: Joe Padon
Sheet 23 of the plans show EFAC line north of the WB structure . Will the state allow the area north from the EFAC boundary that lies between that line and property boundaries be used for lay down and access?
202 - BELGRADE-BOZEMAN - October 23, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 01:49 PM
Company: Alpine Sign Inc
Contact: John
Please provide Sign Design Calculations for this project
Answer
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2026 02:22 PM
The sign design files for the requested project are posted here: SIGN DESIGN CALCS
The requested files are only design files. The Department cannot guarantee the accuracy of the electronic data, particularly as it may be called up by your computer, nor does any data in these files supersede the data in the contract documents. In addition, the Department will not make any revisions to the electronic files prior to award. Changes needed via change ordered work, or changes that are made during construction to fit field conditions, will be provided at that time. See the requirements of Subsection 619.03.2.
MDT is transitioning towards including the Sign Design Calcs as part of the advertised bid package, when applicable. Advertised Bid Packages are linked here: Advertised Bid Packages | Montana Department of Transportation (MDT)
-2-
Submitted: Friday 10-OCT-2025 10:59 AM
Company: Mountain West Holding Company
Contact: Chris Connors
Would the Department consider changing this project to use crossovers so that workers have less exposure to the traveling public. It has been very evident on all of the active projects the last two seasons that the occurence of crashes in and around the Bozeman area are more frequent than other projects around Montana. The benefit that night construction offers to the public for congestion purposes is more than offset by the increased risk presented to workers at night. Traffic control devices, lights, and reflective clothing are not sufficient to protect workers from growing concerns of exposure to the traveling public in that corridor. Regardless of whether work is performed at day or night, there is a unusually higher risk to highway workers on this project.
203 - SF 179 CURVE S OF CHURCHILL - October 23, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Thursday 25-SEP-2025 07:30 PM
Company: Riverside Contracting, Inc.
Contact: George Shick
Can MDT post the design files, dirt runs, mass diagram, and any additional geotechnical information.
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 08-OCT-2025 11:11 AM
The design files for the requested project are posted here: DESIGN FILES
The requested files do not represent the staked project but are only design files. The Department cannot guarantee the accuracy of the electronic data, particularly as it may be called up by your computer, nor does any data in these files supersede the data in the contract documents.
In addition, the Department will not make any revisions to the electronic files pertaining to the staked project, change ordered work, or changes that are made during construction to fit field conditions.
Attached are PDF Files of the available project alignment and/or structures geotechnical report(s), geotechnical report supplements, and geotechnical laboratory summaries. There is remaining geotechnical information that is voluminous and very difficult to compile in a concise manner. Contractors are welcome to come to MDT Headquarters to inspect rock samples taken for the project that are stored here or to look through the complete set of Geotechnical field investigation notes, laboratory testing, analytical, or other data in our project files. It should be noted that the project may have undergone significant changes during the design process after the original geotechnical report and supplements were issued. Thus, some of the information contained in these documents may be out of date or not applicable with regard to the advertised project. Some of the changes include, but are not limited to: Project splits (for funding, ROW issues, etc.) alignment and grade changes; and changes due to environmental factors (sensitive areas, etc.). The documents can be found at: GEOTECHNICAL REPORTS
A mass diagram and dirt runs are not available for the project
-2-
Submitted: Friday 03-OCT-2025 08:57 AM
Company: Williams Civil Construction
Contact: Tosha Johnson
Contract time is stated to be 60 working days starting December 22nd. Can you clarify this is correct? There are concerns regarding the time allotted as well as paving not being possible in the winter months.
Answer
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 11:18 AM
Please see MDT Standard Specification 108.07.3 which outlines contract time assessment during the winter period.
-3-
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 08:30 AM
Company: Williams Civil Construction
Contact: Tosha Johnson
Can MDT post the CAD/design files for this project for 3D modeling purposes.
-4-
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 01:51 PM
Company: Alpine Sign Inc
Contact: John
Please provide Sign Design Calculations for this project
Answer
Submitted: Friday 10-OCT-2025 09:16 AM
The sign design files for the requested project are posted here: SIGN DESIGN CALCS
The requested files are only design files. The Department cannot guarantee the accuracy of the electronic data, particularly as it may be called up by your computer, nor does any data in these files supersede the data in the contract documents. In addition, the Department will not make any revisions to the electronic files prior to award. Changes needed via change ordered work, or changes that are made during construction to fit field conditions, will be provided at that time. See the requirements of Subsection 619.03.2.
MDT is transitioning towards including the Sign Design Calcs as part of the advertised bid package, when applicable. Advertised Bid Packages are linked here: Advertised Bid Packages | Montana Department of Transportation (MDT)
-5-
Submitted: Wednesday 08-OCT-2025 02:16 PM
Company: CK MAY EXCAVATING INC
Contact: Josh McKenzie
Can you please include the existing grade and finish grade terrain files in .XML format instead of .DGN format?
-6-
Submitted: Thursday 09-OCT-2025 03:00 PM
Company: CK MAY EXCAVATING INC
Contact: Josh McKenzie
1. A significant number of utilities appear to be in conflict with the road lowering. Has this work been completed, and if not, when is the anticipated completion date?
2. SP 19 states the 404 permit for the unnamed tributary to Yellow Dog Creek is valid until March 14th, 2026. Does this work need to be completed by March 14th 2026?
204 - THREE FORKS AREA BRIDGE DECKS - October 23, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
No Questions available for this project.
205 - PATH PRESERVATION-MISSOULA CO AND PATH PRESERVATION-RAVALLI CO - October 23, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
No Questions available for this project.
206 - LODGE GRASS-SOUTH - October 23, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
-1-
Submitted: Thursday 25-SEP-2025 10:30 AM
MANDATORY PRE-BID CONFERENCE – Special Provision #5
A pre-bid conference will be held at the following time and location:
Montana Department of Transportation
Billings District Conference Room
424 Morey St.
Billings, MT 59101
406-252-4138
Join Zoom Meeting
https://mt-gov.zoom.us/j/4065401203?pwd=cmFtanhSS0V4R2xYTGRlai9VMW1rQT09
Meeting ID: 406 540 1203
Passcode: 5401203
Dial by Telephone
+1 646 558 8656
Meeting ID: 406 540 1203
Passcode: 5401203
UPDATE
Submitted: Monday 29-SEP-2025 09:34 AM
There was issue with the Zoom meeting link. Please use updated link below.
Special provision #5 is hereby updated: MANDATORY PRE BID CONFERENCE
Join Zoom Meeting
https://mt-gov.zoom.us/j/4065401202?pwd=d1VJWW9vZXpyVWVTTVdQVDlkWklVdz09
Meeting ID: 406 540 1202
Passcode: 5401202
Dial by Telephone +1 646 558 8656
Meeting ID: 406 540 1202
Passcode: 5401202
UPDATE
Submitted: Thursday 09-OCT-2025 11:18 AM
Official Record of Attendance for the Mandatory Pre-Bid Conference: ATTENDENCE RECORD
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 01:53 PM
Company: Alpine Sign Inc
Contact: John
Please provide Sign Design Calculations for this project
207 - D5 BRIDGE DECKS-COLUMBUS AREA - October 23, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
No Questions available for this project.
208 - I-15 BRIDGE DECKS-BUTTE AREA - October 23, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
No Questions available for this project.
209 - SIDEWALKS-SUNBURST - October 23, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 01:47 PM
Company: Alpine Sign Inc
Contact: John
Is it the Departments intention to use the sizes shown in the Signing and Delineation Summary for the D3-1 Street Name signs?
-2-
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 01:48 PM
Company: Alpine Sign Inc
Contact: John
Please provide Sign Design Calculations for this project
Answer
Submitted: Thursday 09-OCT-2025 10:50 AM
The sign design files for the requested project are posted here: SIGN DESIGN CALCS
The requested files are only design files. The Department cannot guarantee the accuracy of the electronic data, particularly as it may be called up by your computer, nor does any data in these files supersede the data in the contract documents. In addition, the Department will not make any revisions to the electronic files prior to award. Changes needed via change ordered work, or changes that are made during construction to fit field conditions, will be provided at that time. See the requirements of Subsection 619.03.2.
MDT is transitioning towards including the Sign Design Calcs as part of the advertised bid package, when applicable. Advertised Bid Packages are linked here: Advertised Bid Packages | Montana Department of Transportation (MDT)
-3-
Submitted: Friday 10-OCT-2025 11:42 AM
Company: Century Companies, Inc.
Contact: Estimating
Will there be any striping or curb painting, incidental or otherwise required on this project?
210 - SF 229 BILLINGS DIST GUARDRAIL - October 23, 2025
Notifications
No Notices available for this project.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
No Questions available for this project.
301 - GF DISTRICT ADA UPGRADES & OFF SYSTEM SIDEWALKS - GF - November 12, 2025
Notifications
-1-
Submitted: Monday 30-JUN-2025 02:45 PM
The Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) is soliciting design and construction services for the tied Design-Build project identified below. The advertisement for the Requests for Qualifications has been opened and contractor and consultant teams (Firms) are encouraged to submit a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) response electronically by 11:00 a.m., local time on July 21, 2025.
Project Name: GF District ADA Upgrades
Project No.: CM 57-1(14)0
Control No.: 10589000
The Great Falls District ADA Upgrades project is intended to improve accessibility and mobility within the City of Great Falls. Existing facilities do not meet current ADA standards, and upgrades to the existing infrastructure are warranted, and have been previously identified as a part of MDT’s ADA transition plan. Possible treatments to remove accessibility barriers include replacement of non-compliant ADA curb ramps, installing pedestrian actuated pushbuttons, eliminating tripping hazards, deteriorated sections, and non-compliant cross slopes. Locations include 1st Avenue North, 2nd Avenue North, 14th Street, and 15th Street.
Tied with:
Project Name: Off System Sidewalks - GF
Project No.: CMGF STWD(977)
Control No.: 10190000
The Off System Sidewalks – Great Falls project is intended to improve sidewalk connectivity through construction of new sidewalk facilities where existing pedestrian routes have only intermittent sidewalks. This project is located primarily in the northwest quadrant of the City of Great Falls. Major improvements include the construction of new sidewalks and ADA-compliant curb ramps
The project RFQ and attachments can be found at the following link: RFQ ATTACHMENTS
-2-
Submitted: Tuesday 05-AUG-2025 08:08 AM
Notification 1:
Short-listed Firms (in alphabetical order)
- Century-Stahly
- Montana Materials & Construction-KLJ
- United Materials-DOWL
Notification 2:
MDT will delay issue of the Request for Proposals for the subject tied projects. MDT will provide an updated procurement schedule when it becomes available.
-3-
Submitted: Tuesday 12-AUG-2025 12:04 PM
The revised procurement schedule has not yet been determined. As such, the Pre-proposal Meeting scheduled for August 14, 2025, will not take place as originally planned. The Pre-proposal Meeting will be rescheduled to occur after issuance of the RFP.
-4-
Submitted: Tuesday 26-AUG-2025 09:20 AM
The revised procurement schedule for the tied Great Falls sidewalk design-build project (UPNs 10589 and 10190) is as follows:
DATE | EVENT |
August 5, 2025 | Short List posted on Q&A Forum |
September 17, 2025 | Request for Proposal Issue |
September 24, 2025 | Pre-Proposal Meeting – 11:00AM MDT |
October 22, 2025 | Q&A Forum Closes – 5:00PM MDT |
October 29, 2025 | Technical Proposal Due Date – 11:00AM MDT |
November 12, 2025 | Bid Price Proposal Due Date – 11:00AM |
December 16, 2025 | Award Date |
December 30, 2025 | Notice to Proceed (*Approximate) |
UPDATE:
Submitted: Friday 03-OCT-2025 12:37 PM
November 12, 2025 - Bid Price Proposal Due Date time corrected to 11:00 AM MST
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
-1-
Submitted: Friday 03-OCT-2025 12:08 PM
The intent of the signal upgrades outlined in the project scope is to enhance pedestrian accessibility and safety through the installation of new pedestrian push buttons and countdown signals, which provide both visual and audible cues to users. The project does not include changes to the existing traffic signal timing or overall intersection operations.
-2-
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 03:57 PM
Construct new concrete sidewalk sections with reinforcement in accordance with the City of Great Falls standard details. Include all costs associated with reinforced concrete sidewalk sections in the lump sum Bid Price Proposal.
Questions
-1-
Submitted: Tuesday 08-JUL-2025 10:52 AM
Company: Stahly Engineering & Associates
Contact: Alisa Etzel
Regarding the Public Involvement portion of the RFQ. Section VII.A.1. states that we are to include qualified public involvement personnel on our team. Does this requirement mean we must use a firm from the MDT term roster, or can we utilize our own qualified in-house staff?
Answer
Submitted: Thursday 10-JUL-2025 12:39 PM
Proposing Firms may, but are not required, to utilize a public involvement consultant from MDT’s term contract roster. Firms may assign the Public Relations Coordinator role to any qualified individual.
-2-
Submitted: Wednesday 24-SEP-2025 03:05 PM
Company: DOWL
Contact: Marissa Madsen
If an existing ramp is a "parallel" ramp, does we have to maintain a "parallel" ramp? This question is also pertinent to other ramp types and if they are intended to be the same type upon completion of the project.
Answer
Submitted: Monday 29-SEP-2025 11:10 AM
The Firm is responsible for determining the final ramp configuration for crossing locations throughout the project. The final design must comply with all applicable design and accessibility standards, while also fulfilling with the project intent to construct permanent improvements within existing right-of-way.
-3-
Submitted: Thursday 25-SEP-2025 03:43 PM
Company: KLJ
Contact: Dan Richardson
If the existing curb and gutter is determined to be in good condition in a location where the RFP states it to be replaced, can the curb and gutter remain in place?
Answer
Submitted: Monday 29-SEP-2025 11:05 AM
MDT identified locations where curb and gutter replacement may be necessary to address existing curb condition, enhance drainage, improve sidewalk constructability, and achieve PROWAG compliant facilities. However, it is the responsibility of the Firm to evaluate all project locations and determine the final limits of curb and gutter replacement based on the Firm’s final sidewalk design, and construction means and methods.
-4-
Submitted: Wednesday 01-OCT-2025 09:21 AM
Company: Montana Lines, Inc.
Contact: Estimating
Please provide electrical as-builts for all intersections that involve electrical work.
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 08-OCT-2025 02:18 PM
Some as-built plan information, including documentation of existing electrical components, is provided in RFP Attachment H. Additional available as-built information can be accessed at the following link: AS BUILT INFO
The accuracy and completeness of the as-built information cannot be guaranteed and should be independently verified by the Firm as needed for design, bidding, and construction purposes.
-5-
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 10:54 AM
Company: DOWL
Contact: Marissa Madsen
If an existing ramp is 4’ wide and the City of Great Falls design standard is 5’ minimum width, does the new ramp width need to comply with City of Great Fall Standards?
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 08-OCT-2025 09:37 AM
Design and construct all new curb ramps in accordance with the City of Great Falls Standard Details. Ensure full compliance with the Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG) to meet federal accessibility requirements. When PROWAG standards exceed local requirements, PROWAG governs.
-6-
Submitted: Monday 06-OCT-2025 10:55 AM
Company: DOWL
Contact: Marissa Madsen
Installing push buttons on several existing poles isn’t going to result in an ADA compliant facility. Does MDT want teams to bid the project per the scope if it results in non-ADA compliant facilities?
Answer
Submitted: Wednesday 08-OCT-2025 09:33 AM
Quantities provided in the RFP are for informational purposes only and should not be used for bidding purposes. The RFP is not prescriptive; an additional separated pole, or a suitable innovation may be required at some locations to provide an ADA / PROWAG compliant facility. Per RFP section V.B.3.a.iii, the Firm should identify locations where standard sidewalk design details may not be suitable, or where it may be technically infeasible to implement improvements that are compliant with ADA / PROWAG requirements.
-7-
Submitted: Thursday 09-OCT-2025 01:42 PM
Company: Century Companies, Inc.
Contact: Estimating
Section R Paragraph 8 of the RFP provides unit prices for incentives and deductions. 6" and 8" sidewalk prices are provided but 4" sidewalk is not shown. It appears that both City of Great Falls and MDT design standards would allow for 4" sidewalk at mid-block areas. Is it the intention of MDT that all sidewalk including mid-block be at least 6" thick?
302 - KAGY BLVD - S 19TH TO WILLSON - April 15, 2026
Notifications
-1-
Submitted: Wednesday 01-OCT-2025 10:00 AM
The Montana Department of Transportation (MDT) is soliciting design and construction services for the Design-Build project identified below. Contractor and consultant teams (Firms) are encouraged to submit a Statement of Qualifications (SOQ) response electronically by 11:00 a.m., local time on October 29, 2025.
Project Name: KAGY BLVD – S 19TH TO WILLSON
Project No: STPU-SSS 1212(8)
Control No: 8931000
This project is located within the City of Bozeman on Kagy Boulevard from S. 19th Avenue to S. Willson Avenue. The scope of work for this project includes widening and reconstruction of Kagy Boulevard from S. 19th Avenue to S. Willson Avenue with intersection improvements. This includes two travel lanes in each direction, new curb and gutter, boulevard, multi-use path on both sides of the roadway, lighting, landscaping, storm drain, pedestrian crossing facilities via grade separation and/or at-grade solutions and raised median/turn lanes. Intersection improvements include two multi-lane roundabouts: one at the S. 11th Avenue intersection and another at the S. 7th Avenue intersection and signal improvements and protected intersection components at the S. Willson Avenue intersection.
The project RFQ and attachments can be found at the following link: RFQ and ATTACHMENTS
-2-
Submitted: Tuesday 07-OCT-2025 07:27 AM
The draft Preliminary Plans, referred to on page 3 of the Request for Qualifications, can be found here: 8931-Kagy-Prelminary-Plans. The Preliminary Plans that will be provided with the RFP transmittal may differ from the draft Plans provided in the link.
Amendments
No Amendments available for this project.
Clarifications
No Clarifications available for this project.
Questions
No Questions available for this project.